A California federal judge erred in concluding a US Patent and Trademark Office precedent known as the Fintiv rule is a “general statement of policy” not subject to public notice-and-comment, the companies argued in an opening brief filed Monday. Fintiv qualifies as a substantive rule requiring pubic feedback because it deprives parties of opportunities to cancel questionable patents and restricts the discretion of tribunal judges, the ...
Big Tech Urges Court to Toss Patent-Office Rule Limiting Reviews
Aug. 6, 2024, 5:33 PM UTC