Oregon Hikes Penalty Maximums for Worker Death Safety Violations
Oregon employers now face some of the highest safety fines in the nation—up to $250,000 if a fatality is linked to a violation of state OSHA rules.
Oregon employers now face some of the highest safety fines in the nation—up to $250,000 if a fatality is linked to a violation of state OSHA rules.
Oil and gas company
The US Occupational Health and Safety Commission issued $18,000 in proposed penalties after a workplace violence investigation into the Big Lots Behavioral Health Pavilion at Nationwide Children’s Hospital in Columbus, Ohio, according to the US Department of Labor Thursday.
Welcome back to the Big Law Business column. I’m Roy Strom, and today we look at what’s causing a period of severe instability among major law firms.
Airport services provider Swissport International AG is facing worker safety inspections and union pressure for safer conditions and higher wages at several US airports.
The US Labor Department’s regulatory agenda has slowed to a standstill while the White House works to whip up enough support for Labor secretary nominee Julie Su.
A former mine safety manager has been sentenced to two years of probation and fined $2,000 for conspiring to make false reports about a mine accident that resulted in an employee’s partial finger amputation, the Justice Department said Tuesday.
CSX Transportation Inc. faces allegations in a federal civil lawsuit that the railroad dismissed an engineer for reporting safety issues.
As employers are making plans to return to their workplaces. How quickly they succeed will likely depend on how many of their employees get vaccinated.
Employer contests a four-item serious citation in 11 parts and $53,976 fine. The serious citation includes the alleged violation of 29.C.F.R. 1910.134(c)(1), for failure to establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures; 29.C.F.R. 1910.134(e)(1), for failure to provide a medical evaluation to determine an employee’s ability to use a respirator before the employee was required to use the respirator in the workplace; and 29.C.F.R. 1910.134(f)(2), for failure to ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting face-piece respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator. (20-0329)
Employer contests a three-item serious citation and $6,998 fine and a repeat citation and $8,906 fine. The serious citation includes the alleged violation of 29.C.F.R. 1926.102(a)(1), for failure to ensure that eye and face protective equipment was used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury; 29.C.F.R. 1926.1053(b)(1), for failure to secure portable ladders used to access an upper landing surface against displacement; and 29.C.F.R. 1926.1053(b)(13), for failure to ensure that the top step of a stepladder was not used as a step. (20-0330)
Employer contests a two-item serious citation and $12,337 fine and a two-item other-than-serious citation with no fine. The serious citation includes the alleged violation of 29.C.F.R. 1910.36(d)(1), for failure to ensure that employees were able to open exit route doors from the inside at all times without keys, tools, or special knowledge; and 29.C.F.R. 1910.178(l)(4)(iii), for failure to conduct an evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator performance at least once every three years. The other-than-serious citation includes the alleged violation of 29.C.F.R. 1910.157(e)(3), for failure to perform annual maintenance checks on fire extinguishers. (20-0317)
Get the latest legal, regulatory, and enforcement news and analysis, as well as in-depth business and industry covering in the following areas: