An Arizona law barring out-of-state retailers from importing alcohol to in-state customers can stand since it’s essential to the state’s regulatory system, a split Ninth Circuit ruled Friday in an amended opinion that supersedes a March ruling.
Even if the state’s physical presence requirement discriminates against two residents wishing to ship wine directly to themselves from out-of-state retailers, it’s an “essential feature” of Arizona’s “three-tier” alcohol regulation scheme, Judge
“By removing the physical-premise requirement, we would effectively be hacking off two ...