The funds were awarded under a post-9/11 program designed to help protect against chemical, biological, radiological and explosive threats, the state said in papers filed Tuesday in Manhattan federal court. The funds are also intended to improve transit security and evacuation systems.
“Obviously New York is no stranger to the risk of terrorist attacks and it’s not just 9/11 that tells us that,” US District Judge
New York is suing to restore the money, which was earmarked by the US for mass transit security. The funds were blocked because of the state’s immigration enforcement policies, which Trump says are in conflict with those of his administration. The judge agreed with New York that the funds were required to be allocated to states “based solely on risk” of terrorist attack.
The
Kaplan said the state will “quite likely” prove that “the reason the money was cut off was a determination on the part of this administration that New York should be punished for not cooperating with its wishes with regard to what it calls the largest mass-deportation program in history.”
New York claims the money was intended for other states at the last minute, near the end of the fiscal year on Sept. 30. Kaplan temporarily blocked the US from making the funds unavailable to New York by disbursing it to other states or returning it to the US Treasury. He set a hearing for Oct. 9 to consider whether to issue a more permanent order.
“New Yorkers lived through the worst terrorist attack in our nation’s history, and we know what is at stake here,” New York Attorney General
New York is also one of 11 states and the District of Columbia that sued in Rhode Island federal court to block the administration from withholding emergency management funds from what it views as “sanctuary” jurisdictions that limit their cooperation with federal immigration enforcement efforts. A judge in that case issued an emergency order on Monday requiring the Department of Homeland Security to stop efforts to redirect the funds.
The New York case is New York v. Noem, 25-cv-08106, US District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan); the multi-state case is Illinois v. Noem, 25-cv-00495, US District Court, District of Rhode Island (Providence).
(Adds DHS statement in fifth paragraph.)
To contact the reporters on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Anthony Aarons, Steve Stroth
© 2025 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.