When the Supreme Court last month scrapped a regulatory doctrine that has been in place for four decades, the future of the administrative state quickly plunged into uncertainty.
Chevron deference, as it was known, gave authority to federal regulators to interpret unclear laws. The high court issued a 6-3 decision June 28 in a pair of cases—Loper Bright v. Raimondo and Relentless v. Department of Commerce—that threw out Chevron, upending decades of regulatory precedent in a move expected to have far-reaching effects constraining federal agencies.
During a second installment of a webinar series Monday, Bloomberg Law reporter ...