‘Fisherman’s Blues’ Could Lead Supreme Court to Overturn Chevron

Jan. 16, 2024, 4:19 PM UTC

On January 17, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the combined cases Relentless v. Dept. of Commerce and Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo. These cases could significantly weaken, or even potentially overturn Chevron deference, a legal doctrine that has been a cornerstone of US administrative law for four decades.

Introduced in 1984, the doctrine directs courts to defer to reasonable interpretations, made by federal agencies, of statutes that are ambiguous or silent with respect to a specific issue. This deference reflects the agency’s expertise and helps navigate legislative gaps. Overturning Chevron would be a shift in administrative law, that would likely weaken the effectiveness of federal agencies to make and enforce rules, while increasing agency oversight by the judiciary.

In this video, we look at the cases before the Court, delve into the origins of Chevron deference, assess its impact on governance, and consider the potential ramifications if it is overturned.

The cases are Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, U.S., No. 22-451 and Relentless Inc, v. Dept. of Commerce, U.S., No. 22-1219.

Featuring:

TRANSCRIPT


To contact the producer on this story: Tanya Lukyanova in New York at tlukyanova@bloombergindustry.com

To contact the senior producer responsible for this story: Andrew Satterat asatter@bloombergindustry.com; to contact the executive producer responsible for this story: Josh Block at jblock [at] bloombergindustry.com

Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:

Learn About Bloomberg Law

AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.

Already a subscriber?

Log in to keep reading or access research tools.