The
The 6-3 ruling Friday is the latest in a line of Supreme Court decisions that have bolstered religious rights, even when they bump up against other societal values. In the latest case, officials in Montgomery County said they were trying to ensure their elementary school curriculum reflected the diversity of their community, including its LGBTQ families.
Writing for the conservative majority, Justice
“A government burdens the religious exercise of parents when it requires them to submit their children to instruction that poses a very real threat of undermining the religious beliefs and practices that the parents wish to instill,” Alito wrote. “And a government cannot condition the benefit of free public education on parents’ acceptance of such instruction.”
The decision comes against the backdrop of President
Read More:
Trump, at a press conference on Friday, called the ruling a “tremendous victory for parents.”
In a dissenting opinion, Justice
“Casting aside longstanding precedent, the court invents a constitutional right to avoid exposure to subtle themes contrary to the religious principles that parents wish to instill in their children,” Sotomayor wrote. “Exposing students to the message that LGBTQ people exist, and that their loved ones may celebrate their marriages and life events, the majority says, is enough to trigger the most demanding form of judicial scrutiny.”
The Montgomery County program includes a book about a girl who is upset about her favorite uncle’s upcoming engagement to a man until the fiancé befriends her. Another book, approved for use as early as kindergarten, centers on a child named Penelope who tells his mother he is a boy.
“Like all other books in the language-arts curriculum, these storybooks impart critical reading skills through engaging, age-appropriate stories,” the county said in its Supreme Court brief. The school system “adheres to a careful, public, participatory selection process to ensure those criteria are met.”
The program was challenged by six parents, led by Muslims Tamer Mahmoud and Enas Barakat.
‘Historic Victory’
Eric Baxter, vice president and senior counsel at the religious liberty group Becket, who argued the case for the parents, called the decision a “historic victory for parental rights.”
“Kids shouldn’t be forced into conversations about drag queens, pride parades, or gender transitions without their parents’ permission,” Baxter said in a statement. “Today, the court restored common sense and made clear that parents — not government — have the final say in how their children are raised.”
School officials said the parents needed to show that they or their children were being coerced into modifying their religious beliefs or practices. The parents said that coercion isn’t the proper test and that the Constitution bars government-run schools from interfering with the religious upbringing of children.
Montgomery County schools at one point provided notice to parents about planned lessons and allowed opt-outs, but the school district changed its policy before the 2023-24 academic year. The school district later said the notice and opt-out system had become too burdensome.
A federal appeals court had ruled against the parents, saying it wasn’t yet clear how the books would be used in the classroom. The panel said that, as the litigation moved forward, families would need to prove that they or their children were being coerced into changing their religious views or practices.
The court has sided with religious rights in roughly a dozen cases during the past decade. Critics say the rulings have infringed on reproductive rights as well as protections for racial minorities and the LGBTQ community.
The case is Mahmoud v. Taylor, 24-29.
(Updates with dissenting opinion, comments from Trump and parents’ rights group.)
To contact the reporters on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Steve Stroth
© 2025 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.