The
Without any public dissents, the high court left in force a Virginia Supreme Court
The nation’s highest court gave no explanation, rejecting the Democrats’ request in a one-sentence order.
The rebuff adds to a flurry of recent Supreme Court decisions that have put Democrats at a sudden disadvantage in this year’s redistricting wars. The high court’s April 29
The Virginia Supreme Court’s reasoning limited the arguments Democrats could wage on appeal because the US Supreme Court generally doesn’t second-guess state judges in their interpretation of their own laws. The 4-3 decision said Virginia didn’t comply with a state constitutional requirement that the legislature vote twice on amendments to that charter, with a state general election taking place in between.
Virginia officials including Attorney General Jay Jones and House Speaker Don Scott told the Supreme Court that the state court’s analysis relied on a misinterpretation of federal election law. They also invoked a 2023 US Supreme Court
Even if the Supreme Court had intervened, it wasn’t clear Virginia could have used the new map at this point anyway. Virginia Republicans told the high court the state still would have been bound by a ruling in a separate case blocking the new map. Republicans also said key deadlines in advance of the state’s Aug. 4 primary had already passed.
Virginia Governor
The Supreme Court in December cleared
Virginia’s current congressional delegation features six Democrats and five Republicans. Under the proposed map, Republicans were favored to win in only one district.
The case is Scott v. McDougle, 25a1240.
© 2026 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.